Super Bowl LIII ended poorly for the Rams, and for the ratings.

The biggest NFL trade this week might not be the Giants sending Odell Beckham to Cleveland, at least not from a dollars-and-cents perspective. As per Andrew Marchand of The New York Post, CBS has agreed to swap the 2022 Super Bowl (LVI, played in Hollywood Park, California) they were set to broadcast to NBC for the 2021 edition (LV, played in Tampa). Marchand writes that there’s no exchange of money involved, because both sides view this move as desirable for them:

There is no compensation because it benefits both networks, sources said.

The move is being made because NBC would like to pair its Super Bowl with the 2022 Olympics. Having the mega-events back-to-back in one year makes selling advertising easier, as NBC will be able to make combo deals instead of competing against another network for many of the same sponsors.

For CBS, it now will avoid having its next Super Bowl going against the Olympics. If the switcheroo hadn’t happened, then the Super Bowl on Feb. 6, 2022, would be matched up against the Olympics that are set to begin Feb. 4 of that year from Beijing.

That idea of pairing the Super Bowl and the Olympics has worked out well in the past; NBC sold plenty of pairing ads in 2018, bringing in an estimated $1.4 billion in revenue between the two events. This can be a bit difficult on the broadcasting side, as the network needs to have several key people on the ground for the Olympics (in Beijing in 2022) who would normally be doing Super Bowl coverage; for example, this led to Mike Tirico skipping the Super Bowl in 2018. And that was for an Olympics that started later in the week after the Super Bowl, not ahead of it, so the hurdles might be even higher this time. But the decision to make this kind of swap suggests NBC thinks the tradeoffs on the ad side are well worth a few production challenges.

But what’s in this for CBS? Well, as Brian Steinberg of Variety notes, this also means that CBS now gets the Super Bowl in a year where they’re set to broadcast the NCAA Tournament championship game, giving them pairing opportunities as well. And it means that they and NBC aren’t going head-to-head, trying to lure advertisers to spend big money on their particular event. That could have led to competition that brought down Super Bowl ad rates, and that’s certainly something the NFL and its broadcast partners don’t want.

That’s especially the case with Super Bowl ad rates staying about flat this year, and with CBS only bringing in an estimated $382 million from sponsors, down from the $408 million NBC reaped in 2018 and the $419 million Fox netted in 2017. Those numbers aren’t the be-all and end-all, of course, as they don’t consider in-house ads (and CBS ran a ton of those this year); some of those are filler for unsold blocks, but some were always designated as a way to promote upcoming in-house content (such as the one for the upcoming Jordan Peele-led reboot of The Twilight Zone on CBS All Access). But with Super Bowl ratings also dropping this year, the NFL and its broadcast partners won’t want anything else that could hurt those ad rates. And this lets CBS have a big marquee February event undisturbed one year, and then lets NBC put theirs back to back the following year.

So this feels like a reasonable move for both networks and for the NFL, but it’s still interesting to see that. The Super Bowl rotation has usually been more static; since ABC’s exit with the 2006 Super Bowl, it’s always been CBS, Fox, NBC, which led to CBS (2010) and Fox (2014) having Super Bowls in Winter Olympic years. This suggests that approach is changing, and that the networks with NFL rights may be more willing to work with each other on mutually-beneficial scheduling changes. (And that might also come into play with some of the discussion of “shaking up” afternoon broadcast packages.)

This isn’t necessarily great for those looking to advertise in 2022, as they now can’t play CBS’ Super Bowl off against NBC’s Olympics (however, there might be some value for bigger brands in particular with Super Bowl + Olympics packages) in an effort to get the best rate, but it seems to make sense for the networks. And we’ll see if there are more moves like this in the years to come. If NBC does wind up retaining NFL rights after the 2022 season, maybe they’ll be able to set it up so that their Super Bowls and Winter Olympics regularly come together.

[The New York Post]

 

About Andrew Bucholtz

Andrew Bucholtz is a staff writer for Awful Announcing.