It seems as though we are close to entering a new era of how people watch sports.
With almost every professional sports league having streaming-exclusive games or events in the past couple of years, the next step was revealed Tuesday when ESPN, TNT Sports, and FOX Sports announced a new sports-only streaming platform coming later this year.
While several specifics remain unclear, the announcement alone has been enough to get people buzzing. It also has led to a lot of discourse, largely from YouTube TV users, about how necessary it will be to keep YouTube TV with the emergence of this new platform.
On3’s Andy Staples said, “So this is essentially cable for sports fans. Curious to see the price, because the only thing I watch on YouTube TV is sports. Beat the price and I probably switch.”
So this is essentially cable for sports fans.
Curious to see the price, because the only thing I watch on YouTube TV is sports. Beat the price and I probably switch. https://t.co/p6PTnRcPrh
— Andy Staples (@Andy_Staples) February 6, 2024
Gambling content creator Dustin Gouker shared a similar sentiment, saying, “My hot take on the new streaming service is I pay for YouTube TV and almost all of my usage is for sports. If I can pretty much replace YTTV with this at a cheaper price, gimme.”
My hot take on the new streaming service is I pay for YouTube TV and almost all of my usage is for sports. If I can pretty much replace YTTV with this at a cheaper price, gimme
— Dustin Gouker (@DustinGouker) February 6, 2024
Yahoo’s Kendall Baker is very intrigued as well, saying, “Very curious to see the price. Because if it’s ultimately, say, $29.99/month for most live sports and I don’t have to get cable or YouTube TV (which IS cable) because I don’t care about news and other channels, then it’s actually way better than cable (for sports fans)”
Very curious to see the price. Because if it’s ultimately, say, $29.99/month for most live sports and I don’t have to get cable or YouTube TV (which IS cable) because I don’t care about news and other channels, then it’s actually way better than cable (for sports fans) https://t.co/k07lyE8JLp
— Kendall Baker (@kendallbaker) February 6, 2024
Not everyone is a fan, though. One YouTube TV user spoke out against the news, saying, Thinking out loud, but does this mean my YouTube TV sub isn’t gonna be enough anymore? I swear man, capitalism certainly breeds competition – a competition of who can get away with the most.”
https://twitter.com/jeravus/status/1755000275838857277
While it’s hard to say at this early point what the full impact of the new streaming service will be from ESPN, Fox, and WBD, it certainly has the potential to shake up the industry once again. Everyone will be watching to see what winners and losers emerge as more details become available.

About Robert O'Neill
Recent Posts
Longtime Bulls announcer Neil Funk pays tribute to Stacey King: ‘He just loved life’
"They're not going to make another Stacey King."
NFL antitrust exemption comes under renewed fire in House Judiciary report
The preliminary report comes days before the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the Sports Broadcasting Act
2026 WCWS final features most-watched college softball game ever
Game 2 of the final between Texas Tech and Texas averaged 2.5 million viewers.
Dana White expecting ‘Super Bowl-type numbers’ for UFC Freedom 250, which will exclusively air on Paramount+
Despite initial reports that it would air on CBS, the UFC Freedom 250 event will be exclusive to Paramount+.
FanDuel lays off several hundred employees amid sports betting industry shifts
"They’re losing good employees who can truly help their future."
Pat McAfee promises ESPN NBA Finals altcast ‘isn’t us being ***holes here’
"We are trying to be an asset to society."