The travails of the Pac-12 are well-documented. Both the conference or the network are falling behind its competitors as far as college football and carriage are concerned. When Commissioner Larry Scott started with the conference, he was hailed as a media visionary. The Pac-12 Network was formed in 2011 with hopes that it would be a cash cow for the league, but it hasn’t happened that way – and it doesn’t look like that will be happening any time soon.

Scott came over from the tennis world, where he increased sponsorship revenue and formed lucrative  television partnerships in Europe. It was that expertise in TV that the Pac-12 was hoping to tap, but instead, the league’s lack of a broadcast partner for the network and its seven-year dispute with DirecTV have caused the league to fall behind in college football, shut out of the Playoff for the third time in four years.

The league’s bowl record last season was 1-6, the worst among the Power Five Conferences. And there are questions whether the league can continue on this path. Scott has promoted the Pac-12 as “The Conference of Champions,” but its football, which counts the most among fans, is leaving a bad taste in the mouths and fans and alumni across the country.

In addition, the Pac-12 is lagging in the money distributed to member schools at just $31 million per university, as compared to $41 million for the SEC and $37 for the Big Ten. But what makes matters worse is that the Pac-12 has far higher expenses than its rival Power Five conferences. The Oregonian looked at what the conference is paying compared to other leagues and the figures aren’t pretty.

Scott’s yearly salary is twice as much as Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delaney ($4.8 million to $2.4 million) and 2.5 times more than SEC head Greg Sankey ($1.9 million).

Conference insiders cast Scott as whip-smart and a scary-good negotiator. Others say he fosters a totalitarian culture, revels in the luxurious perks of his job, and uses his shrewd negotiating tactics in ways that harm the conference itself.

“Larry is a lavish guy; he likes extravagance,” said Bill Moos, the former Oregon and Washington State athletic director, who is now at Nebraska. “He runs the Pac-12 like he’s the commissioner of Major League Baseball.”

And there’s the Pac-12 headquarters in San Francisco, which costs almost $7 million annually to rent. The Big Ten and SEC aren’t paying close to that.

By comparison, the SEC is headquartered in a 25-year-old, two-story building in Birmingham, Ala. The rent costs the conference $318,000 a year.

The Big Ten Conference office makes its primary home in suburban Chicago and also, has a satellite office in New York. Annual rent: $1.5 million.

The Pac-12 Conference headquarters cost the conference $6.9 million in rent in the last reported fiscal year. They’re also carrying $11.7 million in deferred rent.

But as the Pac-12 Network plods along without a network partner and DirecTV still not carrying the network, the league is managing both the production of games and the hiring of talent, something neither the Big Ten and SEC are doing.

Of the 112 full-time employees who work for the Pac-12, only 42 work for the conference itself. The rest are employed by the network. The SEC and Big Ten sell their media rights but aren’t in the media-production business. The Pac-12 offices include 90,000 of square footage dedicated to studios, production bays, control rooms and a host of directors, technicians, equipment and talent.

The Big Ten has Fox as its partner for the Big Ten Network and the SEC has ESPN. Both networks run the channels and do the hiring, so all the Big Ten and SEC have to worry about is providing the actual games to televise.

Next season, ESPN will launch the ACC Network and there’s the potential for the ACC to also surpass the Pac-12 in revenue as long as the current situation holds.

The easy solution for the Pac-12 is to partner with one of the sports networks, but that’s easier said than done at this point. ESPN and Fox are seemingly happy with their partnerships with the other leagues and may not be looking to add another league network. Comcast, which shares the building in San Francisco where the Pac-12 is housed, came close to winning the rights to the Pac-12 in 2011, but lost out to ESPN and Fox. Perhaps there’s Amazon, since the Pac-12 is in tech country, but that could be an extremely long shot right now.

Making matters worse is the fact that DirecTV’s owner, AT&T, plans to drop Pac-12 Network on its U-Verse cable systems.

When the networks launched earlier this decade, U-Verse was one of the original cable providers to sign on, but that was before the company bought DirecTV. AT&T is completing the shutout by removing Pac-12 from its U-Verse lineup.

Larry Scott and the Pac-12 are being held to the fire by member schools and fans who wonder when they’ll see some fruits to the seeds that were planted back in 2011. But as long the league fails to get into the College Football Playoffs and continues down this road to limited national coverage, there will be continued frustration. There’s no end to the the DirecTV dispute, and the increased costs are exacerbating a situation that is leaving the Pac-12 in the dust.

[The Oregonian]

About Ken Fang

Ken has been covering the sports media in earnest at his own site, Fang's Bites since May 2007 and at Awful Announcing since March 2013.

He provides a unique perspective having been an award-winning radio news reporter in Providence and having worked in local television.

Fang celebrates the four Boston Red Sox World Championships in the 21st Century, but continues to be a long-suffering Cleveland Browns fan.

8 thoughts on “The Pac-12 Network is still a beautiful disaster, blowing way too much money on rent and Larry Scott

  1. Too many problems. For one obviously not making the playoffs for most of the years of its existence. And also if my cable provider took away the network, I don’t think I’d miss it. The few games from that conference I want to watch will probably be Fox/ESPN. Granted that can be said for Big10 and SEC as well. There might be a 3rd tier game playing there I might flip to if it’s close but nothing I would lose sleep over if I didn’t have access to.

    1. As an Pac-12 alumnus, I’d definitely miss the Pac-12 Network. I want to see every game my alma mater plays, just like all other college alumni in the country, and they all can. It would be a HUGE recruiting disadvantage for the Pac-12 if they had no comprehensive network coverage for football and basketball. Kids want to go where they will be seen on TV. The number of late-night games on the East Coast is already a problem for the conference; no coverage at all would be a disaster.

      1. Can’t disagree with your personal perspective. But their problem is not you or other alumni watching (of course you would and they expect you to) it’s other people not bothering to take the extra step to watch.

  2. Keep in mind, the difference in population within the footprints of these conferences – and their channels. Big differences.

  3. I can not believe I am saying this but, the PAC 12 should move the offices to Bellevue WA. They could find cheaper space to lease for office space as well as partner with (AT&T controlled) Root sports on production space. They would be able to save millions if they got out of SF they could even move to Las Vegas I am sure they could get a better deal on production space out side of California. Also Larry Scott needs to GO. he has done nothing but suck up money for this conference. I still think the PAC12 networks can work just not under Larry Scott.

    1. TV presence in Seattle area is limiting, but there certainly are places in the Bay Area and LA Area that could easily accomodate this and provide the access to sports people necessary to run this.

      Larry was great for some big ideas up front, but it is time he move on now….

  4. With the troubles at the PAC 12 Network such as they are, expect for USC to bolt to the Big Ten conference.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.