MLB has had a tough time finding a potential home for its package of non-exclusive midweek games, which aired on ESPN for years, but no longer will under the network’s next TV deal. But a suitor has reportedly emerged from the mist, and it’s about as unconventional a partner as you could imagine.
Per the New York Post, MLB and Barstool Sports are discussing a deal for the midweek package. Details remain sparse, and any deal would likely include a gambling element to the broadcasts.
MLB and Barstool potentially could team up to create a new type of broadcast with a focus on in-game gambling.
The talks have started recently, and while they have picked up steam, an agreement is not yet a certainty. One source deemed it “50-50.”
So, here’s the elephant in the room about any deal MLB strikes for midweek games: will the broadcasts be exclusive? If so, the cost will be significantly more expensive for an outlet, and there will likely be more apprehension from MLB’s older fanbase if a digital outlet nabs the rights (Barstool, Amazon, YouTube, WhatTimeIsItRightNow.com, etc) to the package.
If the package isn’t exclusive, MLB (theoretically) should have more potential bidders in the market for the games due to the lower cost. But it’s also a double-edged sword: a lack of exclusivity, while also making the package cheaper, also lowers its overall desirability (thus, the reason ESPN excised those games from its latest TV deal) for outlets looking to add live content hours to their platforms.
I also think that going heavy on the potential sports betting aspect somewhat limits the audience here, a concern I had last week when writing about Sinclair’s direct to consumer app. Viewers in states without mobile sports betting, including California, Florida, and Texas, wouldn’t get any benefits from the betting content. If the games ended up being exclusive, viewers in those markets (and others) would essentially be forced into watching a game broadcast featuring elements not applicable to them, which seems counterproductive.
Overall, it does seem like the midweek package will end up as more of a second-screen, non-exclusive experience as opposed to the more traditional national broadcasts. If that’s the eventual outcome here, it’s the latest step in a sad, but inevitable, decline for what was once quite a vaunted part of the weekly MLB package.

About Joe Lucia
I hate your favorite team. I also sort of hate most of my favorite teams.
Recent Posts
Augusta National chairman admits Dude Perfect hijinks at Amen Corner wasn’t ‘best idea’
"It does point out that we try things every once in a while that are a little bit nontraditional."
‘Women’s Sports Now’ moving from Roku to ESPN, premiering April 16
"We’re continuing to expand how we serve fans of women’s sports."
NFL Network’s Lance Zierlein compares 2026 Draft to ‘grilled, skinless chicken with light seasoning’
"There's not a lot of flash and sizzle, but it will sustain many teams."
Golf streaming and viewing picks for April 10, 2026: How to watch the 2nd round of the Masters
Prime Video and ESPN will have the main coverage of The Masters starting at 1 p.m. ET and there will be online coverage throughout the morning on various platforms.
TV and streaming viewing picks for April 10, 2026: How to watch MLB today
Apple TV has is usual Friday night double dip while MLB Network provides a tripleheader
Mike Vrabel-Dianna Russini photos were shopped around before landing at New York Post
The photographer, who reportedly did not initially identify Russini, also tipped off TMZ.