Early Wednesday morning, Warner Bros. Discovery filed a form with the Securities and Exchange Commission outlining why the company ultimately rejected Paramount’s offer to purchase the company in favor of Netflix’s deal.
WBD set forth numerous reasons why it considered Paramount’s offer the weaker of the two, including uncertainty regarding Paramount’s funding. Risk associated with not going forth with its planned split should it accept Paramount’s offer, but a deal wasn’t ultimately approved by the federal government. Paramount’s poor credit rating. All completely valid reasons why WBD wouldn’t want to sell itself to Paramount.
But there was another interesting point in WBD’s filing on Wednesday that centered on Paramount’s sports rights. In particular, WBD called out what it perceives as Paramount paying “above-market” rates for certain of its media rights deals.
“PSKY has recently entered into multiple programming commitments that may further stress its financial performance. In the short period since the completion of the Paramount/Skydance transaction, PSKY has signed above-market, multi-year programming and sports licensing deals, both domestic and international,” the filing reads. “Despite limited visibility into their long-term performance, PSKY will begin to bear significant fixed financial costs related to these agreements in the future. This, together with potentially higher costs associated with NFL rights given the league’s right to renegotiate early, could create further headwinds to PSKY’s financial profile.”
Since David Ellison and Skydance acquired Paramount earlier this year, the company has entered into a seven-year, $7.7 billion agreement with UFC to stream fights on Paramount+. At the time, the deal was considered well above market rate, and Paramount was not considered a likely bidder until the final moments of the negotiation process.
Then, of course, there’s the uncertainty of Paramount’s ability to renew a deal with the NFL. The NFL has indicated a willingness to renegotiate its current broadcast deals early, even before its 2029 opt-out. Refreshing those deals, which already cost Paramount $2.1 billion per year, would likely result in the company paying significantly more to the league than it already does.
It’s rare that any media company would outright say one of its peers is making poor business deals. Usually, the market speaks for itself on those matters. But this is a unique situation in which WBD is actively trying to convince the federal government that it is acting in the best interest of its shareholders by not combining with Paramount.
Whether WBD’s assessment is correct won’t be apparent until Paramount’s rights deals play out. Maybe the UFC deal will prove a massive success. Or perhaps Paramount will be able to strike a favorable deal with the NFL.
But right now, it’s clear that one of its direct competitors does not believe the company is making sound decisions regarding sports rights.

About Drew Lerner
Drew Lerner is a staff writer for Awful Announcing and an aspiring cable subscriber. He previously covered sports media for Sports Media Watch. Future beat writer for the Oasis reunion tour.
Recent Posts
Knicks fans completely take over Philadelphia local broadcast, too
"You would think that I'm in New York right now..."
Red Sox’s Jarren Duran deletes Instagram account after criticizing NBC Sports’ Michael Holley
Red Sox players probably have more pressing things to worry about this season.
Jemele Hill, ESPN’s Ben Baby push back on WNBA locker room media restrictions
"The only major sport in the U.S. that doesn’t have it. Bad for the fans and the growth of the game."
Orioles pitcher Anthony Nunez provides mid-game gender reveal to family watching at home
"Now that's a Mother's Day gift there."
Media analyst: Streamers would need to offer NFL ‘astronomical’ rights fee for league to move off broadcast
"An Apple or a Netflix would have to offer a astronomical number for them to make it worth their while to get into what surely would be a political fight."
Don’t Blink: LIV Golf broadcast appears to miss Jon Rahm albatross
The shot was not shown nor mentioned on the LIV Golf broadcast.