There are generational talents, and then there are lesser quarterbacks like Tom Brady and Peyton Manning, according to Ryan Clark.
Thursday morning on ESPN’s First Take, Clark and Dan Orlovsky were debating the generational talent candidacy of Arch Manning. Orlvosky believes the Texas Longhorns quarterback is a generational talent, while Clark does not. And when you hear just how exclusive Clark keeps his list of generational talents at the quarterback position, it’s not surprising that he hasn’t invited Arch Manning to the party.
“I don’t think Tom Brady, I don’t think Drew Brees, I don’t think Peyton Manning are generational talents.” – Ryan Clark pic.twitter.com/sTgNQXxfBY
— Awful Announcing (@awfulannouncing) September 4, 2025
“I think John Elway was a generational talent. I think Patrick Mahomes is a generational talent,” Clark told Orlovsky and Stephen A. Smith. “I don’t think Tom Brady, I don’t think Drew Brees, I don’t think Peyton Manning are generational talents. I think Andrew Luck ended up being a generational talent, I don’t think there’s a ton of them out there.”
This is a hot take seemingly meant for July, when ESPN is more starved for content and engagement, but not the morning of the NFL season kicking off. If you want to slow the hype train on Arch Manning, then OK, now is the time to do it after his Week 1 performance against Ohio State. But Tom Brady and Peyton Manning? Peyton was absolutely considered a generational talent in college. And if he had any ability to run, he would have been graded as high of a prospect as Elway and Luck were.
The problem is this debate can be twisted several ways based on how you define “generational talent.” Are we talking about “generational talent” literally? Because that would negate Brady, Brees and Manning from the conversation considering they played in the same generation.
Are we talking about “generational talent” coming out of college? Because then yes, even a benched Anthony Richardson was more of a generational talent than Tom Brady, who fell to the sixth round. But if we’re talking about career accomplishments, then obviously, Brady and Manning proved to be “generational talents” at the quarterback position.
Without setting the ground rules for what is meant by “generational talent,” Orlovsky and Clark seemed to be debating different things. And Clark’s definition of the term took him to a point where he was claiming Brady and Manning don’t fit the mold. But if Brady and Peyton Manning aren’t considered generational talents, then quarterbacks shouldn’t even want the label.

About Brandon Contes
Brandon Contes is a staff writer for Awful Announcing and The Comeback. He previously helped carve the sports vertical for Mediaite and spent more than three years with Barrett Sports Media. Send tips/comments/complaints to bcontes@thecomeback.com
Recent Posts
YouTube TV reportedly set to offer $20 credit if ESPN carriage dispute continues
Will a YouTube TV-Disney deal be reached before the Eagles-Packers Monday Night Football game?
Fox rules analyst Mike Pereira: USC’s number-switch fake punt should have been called back
"Huard was lined up as the punter, so therefore that’s actually a 15-yard penalty because both he and Johnson lined up as the punter (in the game)."
After 655 days, the A’s turn social media comments back on
The A's have also lost a decent number of followers during the comment ban.
Big Ten Network seemingly had no idea Ohio State receiver Carnell Tate wasn’t playing
Where was Carnell Tate?
Indiana’s epic comeback win over Penn State broke Gus Johnson
We're not sure what Gus said on that Omar Cooper, Jr. touchdown call, but it was electric.
Nick Saban: ‘It would surprise me’ if Dabo Swinney left Clemson for new job
"In my conversation with him, he never mentioned that. He was totally focused on what his team needs to do to have success."