NFL owners voted Tuesday to eliminate teams’ ability to protect home opponents from being scheduled for international games.
Until now, teams could shield two home matchups per year from being moved abroad. That number had already been cut down significantly — teams once had the ability to protect four or five home opponents — and the league has been chipping away at it for years. Now, it’s zero.
The NFL is also eliminating teams’ ability to protect games against specific home opponents from being played abroad. Until now, teams could protect two home games each year. https://t.co/utRnTQaEaA
— Albert Breer (@AlbertBreer) May 19, 2026
Owners also voted to raise the cap on international games from eight to 10 starting in 2027, per NFL EVP Peter O’Reilly. That cap doesn’t account for the Jaguars’ annual game at Wembley Stadium, which sits outside the standard international series framework under a separate agreement the team has held with the league for years. Add that in, and the NFL could play as many as 11 games overseas in 2027.
NFL EVP Peter O’Reilly announces that owners voted through a measure to increase the cap on international games from eight to 10 in 2027. That doesn’t include the Jags’ game at Wembley, so we could have 11 international games next year.
— Albert Breer (@AlbertBreer) May 19, 2026
The protection change is the more consequential of the two. As Mike North explained on a media call last week, teams tend to protect their best opponents, which quickly limits what the league can send overseas. Once Baltimore gets used in one market, it’s off the table for the others. Teams like Philadelphia and Cincinnati, which have been eager for international appearances, kept getting squeezed out because their opponents kept protecting games against them.
“You can’t have a team say, ‘Well, I don’t want my two best games eligible for international,'” North said. “What kind of message does that send to the international fans?”
The league is playing nine international games in 2026 across seven countries, already the most in history and surpassing the previous cap. Ten is a step forward, but it’s not where the league wants to end up. Goodell has said his target is 16 international games per season — one for every team — and you can’t really run a protection system in a world where every team is going overseas every year.
Getting rid of it now is the logical move, but it also makes financial sense for the league.
The NFL has been targeting a dedicated international rights package worth potentially billions, separate from its domestic deals. The value of that package comes down to the quality of the games it contains, and teams shielding their best opponents have been an obstacle to putting together a compelling slate.
With the protections gone, the league can finally put its best games in that package starting in 2027.

About Sam Neumann
Since the beginning of 2023, Sam has been a staff writer for Awful Announcing and The Comeback. A 2021 graduate of Temple University, Sam is a Charlotte native, who currently calls Greenville, South Carolina his home. He also has a love/hate relationship with the New York Mets and Jets.
Recent Posts
MLB
Outsports’ Ken Schultz explains why Pride Nights still matter
Everyone’s convinced Thierry Henry, Zlatan Ibrahimović really don’t like Alexi Lalas
"We're at the future on the pitch, we're at the present here..." "And Alexi is part of the past."
TV and streaming viewing picks for June 13, 2026: How to watch World Cup Group matches
A big day in the FIFA World Cup with four matches spanning from coast to coast and Canada on Fox, FS1 and Telemundo as well as their streaming platforms.
2026 FIFA World Cup opening match scores record audiences for Fox, Telemundo
If the viewership for the opening match of the 2026 FIFA World Cup is any indication, Fox and...
Knicks’ historic NBA Finals comeback garners biggest Game 4 audience since 1998
Compared to last year’s lackluster NBA Finals audience, Game 4 increased by 123%.
Clint Dempsey torches Jesse Marsch over anthem comments: ‘Not going to take advice from someone who switched to the other side’
"Man, I can't take this guy too seriously."