John Schriffen is wrapping up his second season as the television play-by-play voice of the Chicago White Sox. One Chicago columnist, Jeff Agrest of the Chicago Sun-Times, says that the White Sox should not bring Schriffen back for Year 3.
Agrest started his editorial by recalling an awkward exchange between Schriffen and Gordon Beckham during a recent game. Still, one of the primary reasons he cited in calling for Schriffen’s dismissal is his on-air rapport with longtime color analyst Steve Stone.
“Schriffen hasn’t clicked with lead analyst Steve Stone, which is a must. He seems more at ease with Beckham and Dan Plesac,” Agrest wrote. “The two of them generally don’t have conversations. They take turns talking. Schriffen doesn’t set up Stone enough to tap into his extensive knowledge of the game. In fact, Schriffen tries to be an analyst himself. He talks so much about pitching that he takes away from Stone.”
Among the other issues cited was Schriffen’s “excessively positive” commentary. Agrest cited referring to Miguel Vargas (who, heading into Friday, had a .227/.308/.391 slash line) as a “star” and pitcher Shane Smith (with a modest 4.06 ERA and 1.219 WHIP) as “one of the best in the game right now.” Schriffen’s overly positive outlook was occasionally an issue during the team’s record-setting 121-loss campaign in 2024, as well.
Those issues, though, were not the only ones cited by Agrest.
“Schriffen doesn’t believe in brevity,” Agrest wrote. “Count how many times he says the inning during a game. Yes, announcers give the count, outs and score even with a scorebug on the screen. But it’s like a tick for Schriffen, who once said it was the top of the ninth inning 10 times within six batters.
“He’s not prepared enough for the broadcasts,” Agrest continued. “His preparation amounts to hearing what the team tells him and then regurgitating it without adding any depth. He leans into vibes and uses cliches instead of providing useful research. He talks about players needing a ‘reset’ or being ‘locked in’ as if they’re robots simply pushing a button.”
Schriffen’s tenure with the White Sox has been rocky since the beginning. In 2024, Awful Announcing readers voted the White Sox announcers as the worst in the league. The 2025 results were better but only marginally, with the White Sox ranking No. 27 of 30 teams. To compare, in 2023, when the primary announce crew was Stone as the analyst and Jason Benetti as the play-by-play voice, the White Sox were one of the best-regarded crews in the league, ranking sixth.

About Michael Dixon
About Michael:
-- Writer/editor for thecomeback.com and awfulannouncing.com.
-- Bay Area born and raised, currently living in the Indianapolis area.
-- Twitter:
@mfdixon1985 (personal).
@michaeldixonsports (work).
-- Email: mdixon@thecomeback.com
Send tips, corrections, comments and (respectful) disagreements to that email. Do the same with pizza recommendations, taco recommendations and Seinfeld quotes.
Recent Posts
Sean McDonough delivers announcer jinxes on LSU-Alabama broadcast
"Announcer jinx No. 1. More to come." And there was.
Dirk Nowitzki feels bad for Dallas Mavericks fans following ‘disastrous start’
"They can’t shoot. They can’t make plays. It’s all going side-to-side, east-west, handoffs. It’s been tough to watch."
Mina Kimes ‘deeply embarrassed’ about endorsing shady solitaire app
"A colossal f*ck-up on my part."
YouTube TV reportedly set to offer $20 credit if ESPN carriage dispute continues
Will a YouTube TV-Disney deal be reached before the Eagles-Packers Monday Night Football game?
Fox rules analyst Mike Pereira: USC’s number-switch fake punt should have been called back
"Huard was lined up as the punter, so therefore that’s actually a 15-yard penalty because both he and Johnson lined up as the punter (in the game)."
After 655 days, the A’s turn social media comments back on
The A's have also lost a decent number of followers during the comment ban.