Variety’s tweets and Facebook posts on Sage Steele lawsuit called her a ‘former ESPN anchor’

Does the Variety social media team know something about Sage Steele’s future at ESPN that’s not in their actual reporting? The magazine put out a story Tuesday on Steele’s ongoing lawsuit against the network, headlined “ESPN Anchor and Vaccine Skeptic Sage Steele’s Free Speech Battle With Disney Heats Up.” But the way they initially presented it on social media had Steele no longer with ESPN.

The story itself is largely a recapping of Steele’s lawsuit (which was filed last April, citing the company’s reaction to her vaccine mandate comments on Jay Cutler’s podcast), opinions from various lawyers (including Steele’s lawyer Bryan Freedman, who also represents Tucker Carlson and Don Lemon), comparisons of this to Disney’s own ongoing legal fight with Ron DeSantis and the Florida government, and a discussion of how Steele and ESPN are currently in mediation (with that window closing on June 12). But on both Twitter and Facebook, Variety‘s initial posts (deleted on Twitter after 90-plus minutes, still live on Facebook more than two hours later) called Steele a “former ESPN anchor,” which is not the case at this point (she was even hosting SportsCenter as usual on the network Tuesday):

Mistakes happen, of course. And this one was corrected (at least on Twitter), where Variety‘s subsequent tweets on this correctly identified Steele’s current status:

ESPN Anchor and Vaccine Skeptic Sage Steele's Battle With Disney Heats Up https://t.co/1Hlqm33Y8d

— Variety (@Variety) May 30, 2023

ESPN anchor Sage Steele is waging a free speech legal battle against Disney over her anti-vaxx comments. The conflict echoes the media giant's free speech fight against Ron DeSantis.https://t.co/ZRms88Z5jq

— Variety (@Variety) May 30, 2023

But this is certainly an interesting mistake, and it maybe adds even more to the conversation about Steele (seen above in 2019) potentially leaving ESPN. As has been repeatedly noted with her lawsuit, it’s quite unusual to see a current employee taking legal action against their network, with those suits more frequently coming from former employees. And Steele has continued to receive prominent on-air assignments despite the lawsuit. (On that front, she claims in the suit that some assignments she was pulled from after her comments represented punishment, with ESPN responding by saying that’s not punishment without docked pay, and airtime is a protected “casting decision“; we’ll see how that lawsuit is resolved, but Steele is certainly getting a lot of ESPN airtime at the moment.) But it’s certainly possible to see these sides parting ways, and the Variety social media posts here maybe add to that discussion even more, even if they were just innocent mistakes.

[Variety]