ESPN’s cancellation of Barstool Van Talk continues to reveal some of the inner machinations at the network. The decision exposed the conflict between those who enjoyed Pardon My Take and the opportunity to add two talented personalities to the programming roster, and a sizable contingent in Bristol who were loudly opposed to any association with Barstool Sports.
As SportsBusiness Journal’s John Ourand reports, Pardon My Take had two significant advocates in Burke Magnus, ESPN’s executive vice president of programming and scheduling, and Connor Schell, executive vice president of content. Both believed that the hosts of the show, Dan “Big Cat” Katz and PFT Commenter, were potential stars who could reach an audience that was eluding ESPN.
In addition, Magnus and Schell felt that partnering with Barstool wouldn’t make many waves because several ESPN personalities were guests on Pardon My Take, while Big Cat and PFT had already appeared on network programming. They did realize that a lot of Barstool’s content would raise objections among on-air talent and executives in Bristol, but ultimately felt that a show based on Pardon My Take and getting in business with Big Cat and PFT would be worth risking upsetting that contingent.
The latest
Despite Magnus and Schell continuing to support the show, with Magnus touting the audience Barstool Van Talk drew among men ages 18-to-34, Skipper couldn’t ignore the outrage developing among ESPN employees, nor the fear that Barstool Sports might produce something that would put the network in a bad situation by association. ESPN wanted no mention of Barstool in the show’s title, but Barstool founder Dave Portnoy insisted that the brand be part of the program. That appeared to confirm Skipper’s concerns that the show couldn’t disassociate itself from Barstool and focus on the “Pardon My Take” brand.
Rather than wait until Barstool did something that gave ESPN no choice but to cancel Barstool Van Talk, Skipper decided to be proactive and shutter the show, even though only one episode had aired. Effectively, he overruled Schell and Magnus, both of whom wanted to keep the show on the air. As of last Monday, the decision was made and everyone involved was informed of the cancellation.
When Schell was promoted to his current position, the belief was that he would handle content, while Skipper focused primarily on the business side. Many felt that ESPN had suffered when Skipper became the network’s president, leaving no one to oversee content. But it’s certainly notable that Skipper went against his executives in charge of content and programming, and appears to have left the Barstool debacle at their feet. In the aftermath, will ESPN be as willing to take risks with its programming in an attempt to reach new audiences?
There is plenty more in SBJ’s piece worth reading, including more on the internal conversations between ESPN and Barstool, and the tensions that were heightened by Ponder’s tweets.

About Ian Casselberry
Ian is a writer, editor, and podcaster. You can find his work at Awful Announcing and The Comeback. He's written for Sports Illustrated, Yahoo Sports, MLive, Bleacher Report, and SB Nation.
Recent Posts
Pat McAfee rants about ‘fat, lazy’ sports media bums on Super Bowl’s Radio Row
At least he got it out of his system!
News
Aaron Rodgers’ marriage media mousetrap
F1 movie earns Best Picture Oscar nomination
The F1 movie starring Brad Pitt received the ultimate acclaim as it was nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars.
Stugotz says ‘hurtful’ split from Dan Le Batard made him consider leaving the industry
"I'm still trying to claw my way out."
Lionsgate to produce ‘The Crown’-style show about Manchester United
The Hollywood studio seems to be taking a liking to sports-focused adaptations.
Prime Video to debut football docuseries ‘The Object Of The Game’ featuring Tony Romo, Mike Tomlin, others
The three-part series will debut Feb. 4.