SB Nation has produced plenty of interesting longform pieces that have been well-received, but the one they ran Wednesday came under intense fire almost immediately, and the piece was pulled completely later in the day. (Update: See the end of this piece for SB Nation’s explanation why.) The piece in question was almost 12,000 words on Daniel Holtzclaw, a former Oklahoma City police officer who was sentenced to 263 years in jail in January for on-duty rapes and sexual assaults; the sports connection was that Holtzclaw played football at Eastern Michigan and had NFL dreams.
SB Nation’s done some excellent longform pieces on athletes and sexual assault charges before, including stories on Mel Hall and Dave Meggett, but this one took a rather different approach, relying heavily on Holtzclaw’s former teammates’ and parents’ comments that he couldn’t possibly have done this and alleging that he was only accused thanks to national backlash against police officers through movements such as Black Lives Matter. It also carried a rather substantial potential conflict of interest just from its author, whose background wasn’t disclosed until the end of the piece:
“covered his entire college football career” ah well ok in that case pic.twitter.com/wukK0BbwtW
— Erik Malinowski (@erikmal) February 17, 2016
Another big issue with the piece was the way it didn’t include or even reference most of the stories from Holtzclaw’s victims, which were reported by Buzzfeed’s Jessica Testa in December. Testa took strong exception to this piece:
oh, Daniel Holtzclaw raped and assaulted black women bc he was sad about not getting into the NFL pic.twitter.com/7jlEkIi9N0
— jessica testa (@jtes) February 17, 2016
The piece also drew other major backlash on Twitter almost immediately, including from ESPN journalist Kevin Van Valkenburg:
I don't like to talk much writer s— so I say this as respectfully as I can, but this entire piece needs rethinking https://t.co/6P2MC4B6BL
— Kevin Van Valkenburg (@KVanValkenburg) February 17, 2016
That piece is really tone deaf. Like embarrassingly so. I can't tell you how many convos I've had with women today who are appalled by it.
— Kevin Van Valkenburg (@KVanValkenburg) February 17, 2016
Striking the right tone is is hard, but important. It's super important when, say, writing about a serial rapist.
— Kevin Van Valkenburg (@KVanValkenburg) February 17, 2016
Know what? You shouldn't have to be a woman to see writing about the NFL dreams of one of the worst rapists in law enforcement ever is wack.
— Kevin Van Valkenburg (@KVanValkenburg) February 17, 2016
Here are some of the other criticisms the piece took:
Wow, this is the nicest depiction of a serial sexual predator I have ever read. https://t.co/ytnYBXsDbd
— Madi Alexander (@MadiLAlexander) February 17, 2016
WOW @SBNation with the hot take that Holtzclaw is somehow a victim. WTF (thx @taylorklong for pointing this out) pic.twitter.com/HhqYTShBFU
— Sea_Bunker (@Sea_Bunker) February 17, 2016
The worst part about this is Arnold's decision to refer to Holtzclaw's victims as women with "troubled backgrounds." https://t.co/kK09y39BkL
— Zach (@BarroldBonds) February 17, 2016
I couldn’t finish that @SBNation feature on the NFL dreams of serial rapist Daniel Holtzclaw. Sorry. I have no idea what they were thinking.
— Jamil Smith (@JamilSmith) February 17, 2016
I can't believe I'm reading a profile of Daniel Holtzclaw at SB Nation whose thesis is basically, "OMG PEOPLE DON'T THINK HE DID THIS"
— Jessica Luther (@scATX) February 17, 2016
@scATX They led with the effect the conviction had on him. That was the hook.
WHO. GIVES. A. SHIT.
— Adam Jacobi (@Adam_Jacobi) February 17, 2016
So much good longform out there on interesting and worthy topics and the hopes & dreams of this asshole gets the treatment? Nope.
— Lisa Marie (@LSUcaligrl) February 17, 2016
@LSUcaligrl @AndrewBucholtz at some point you'd think an editor might say hey, let's focus on the charges/victims > NFL broken dreams angle.
— Zac Gershberg (@DrGersh) February 17, 2016
As of Wednesday evening, SB Nation hadn’t responded to a request for comment on the Holtzclaw story and why it was pulled. We’ll update if they do.
Update: Here is their response:
Earlier today, SB Nation posted a story called “Who is Daniel Holtzclaw?” that attempted to find out the backstory of convicted serial rapist Daniel Holtzclaw. The story focused on his football background in particular.
The publication of this story represents a complete breakdown of a part of the editorial process at SB Nation. There were objections by senior editorial staff that went unheeded. It was tone-deaf, insensitive to the victims of sexual assault and rape, and wrongheaded in approach and execution. There is no qualification: it was a complete failure.
In light of that failure, we’ve taken the story down. I take full responsibility for this as editorial director. It was not up to our standards as a website. It was not up to our standards as a part of Vox Media. It is not reflective of our ideals, or who we want to be as an organization in the future.
We’re reviewing all of our processes in light of this failure. There are a lot of them, and I promise to talk in detail about them publicly while we work through all of them.
Spencer Hall
Editorial Director
SB Nation
Comments are closed.