Last week, we were subjected to some asinine, condescending fantasy football advice, courtesy of espnW, in which players were ranked by whether or not they were considered marriage material vs. a one-night stand.
Well, apparently enough people found this to be offensive and patronizing, because espnW is now changing their tune. They’ve added an “editor’s note” that said the following, retracting player rankings based on whether or not NFL players were marriage material:
Editor’s note: espnW aims to speak to all women who love sports, from the deeply engaged to the casual fan. For the already knowledgeable, serious fantasy football player — female or male — ESPN’s extensive fantasy football coverage offers everything they might need.
Given that, we were struck by the unique voices of the women at Her Fantasy. Far from being a patronizing effort, we saw the sisters’ voices as an entertaining layer to supplement ESPN’s existing coverage. For fantasy rookies, they offer an alternative, tongue-in-cheek approach that we enjoyed and think readers who are new to the game might, too. In this particular post, one of several already on espnW.com, they were deliberately playful with relationship tropes and categories — all in the spirit of having fun with the game and having a good laugh. Understanding that the lighthearted approach here was misunderstood as perpetuating the very stereotypes we intended to have fun with, we will not use the relationship category conceit moving forward. We look forward to working with the Her Fantasy team this season to develop their voices with espnW.
…Understanding that the lighthearted approach here was misunderstood as perpetuating the very stereotypes we intended to have fun with…
“We were TOTALLY kidding, but if you were too dumb and sensitive to see that, then FINE.” The approach could have been passed off as lighthearted if there was anything funny about their list, but instead they pushed lazy stereotypes and we’re supposed to now feel bad for not getting the attempted joke?

Oh well, at least we’ll always remember the time espnW “lightheartedly” called Ben Roethlisberger a “flirt.”
#FF @espnW pic.twitter.com/4WHAdEZNXp
— PFT Commenter (@PFTCommenter) September 2, 2014

Comments are closed.
About Reva Friedel
Reva is a staff writer for Awful Announcing and the AP Party. She lives in Orange County and roots for zero California teams.
Recent Posts
ESPN/ABC earns most-watched Stanley Cup Final since 2019
The series averaged 5.2 million viewers across six games.
Jon Stewart teases Paramount bosses over ‘god awful,’ ‘joyless’ UFC Freedom 250
Stewart signed an extension with Paramount's new owners last year.
Terry Bradshaw insists he has no plans to retire from Fox: ‘That would be their call, not mine’
"Billy Graham said that the day that you retire is the day you start dying."
Vincent Goodwill stuns ESPN by reducing NBA championship to a ‘participation trophy’
"How do we know that any of the last eight champions are actually validated because they have not done it again"
Josh Pate: NCAA is ‘maybe beyond repair’ after Brendan Sorsby scandal
"It's not even their fault, they're powerless to enforce their rules."
ESPN re-signs veteran investigative reporter Don Van Natta Jr.
The extension comes at a time when some observers have questioned ESPN's commitment to investigative journalism.