Monday's daytime SportsCenter thankfully didn't spend the entire morning on the Harlem Shake, but they did deliver inanity in spades once again. This time it was resident debating expert Stephen A. Smith comparing the impressive streaks of the Miami Heat and the Chicago Blackhawks.
The streaks are fundamentally different. Miami has won 14 straight games. Chicago has recorded a point in 22 straight to begin the season (19 wins, 3 OT losses). But because this is "Embrace Debate", one has to be better than the other and ESPN had to trot out one of their analysts to take a side.
Of course, who better than one of Bristol's resident expert debaters, Stephen A. Smith to rant on this topic… because he's such a respected authority on the sport of hockey, you know. Just watch and cringe in pain and agony as Screamin' A. totally dismisses the Blackhawks point streak because of "ties."
Then note that the NHL hasn't had a tie since April 4th, 2004.
For the record, it was 3 shootout losses for the Blackhawks, not 3 ties.
This is what happens when you employ only one competent hockey personality and prefer bluster to knowledge. You end up with an ESPN analyst talking about things that haven't existed for almost nine years. Hockey is about points, yes. So is soccer. Hockey is a different sport than basketball and orders its standings differently, rewarding teams with points for not losing in regulation. This is apparently a difficult concept to grasp.
This is what also happens when you try to compare and debate the merits of two winning streaks when one isn't even a winning streak at all. It's a point streak. There's a difference.
I just wonder if Stephen A. Smith's lack of understanding about the rules of the sport and flippantly saying "it's hockey we're talking about here" still counts as proof of ESPN talking about the NHL?
If ESPN is really the worldwide leader in sports as they proclaim to be, maybe they can find someone to put on television next time to talk hockey who is aware of the existence of the Columbus Blue Jackets. They've only been around for 13 years.
Need more Awful Announcing in your life? Sign up for the brand new AA Newsletter! It's free, you may win a prize, and you may even get a laugh or two at Stephen A. Smith's extensive hockey knowledge. Just click below.


Comments are closed.
About Matt Yoder
Recent Posts
AA Podcast: T-Bob Hebert on Indiana’s title win, Lane Kiffin, Barstool Sports, and more
On this week’s episode of the Awful Announcing Podcast, host Brandon Contes interviews Wake Up Barstool co-host T-Bob Hebert....
Fernando Mendoza takes to LinkedIn to share lessons from National Championship run
"What winning a National Championship taught me about B2B sales."
Matt Barrie claims SEC still draws more eyeballs than Big Ten, says only LSU can save conference
"Maybe one league's the deepest and gets the most eyeballs, but the other one is where it counts as the national champion."
Paul Finebaum eats crow about Indiana: ‘Nobody was more incorrect … than me’
"There can be debate about whether Indiana had the best season in college football history, but there can be no debate: It is the greatest story in the history of the game."
’60 Minutes’ earns putrid audience against NFL playoffs, as intended
Just 4.9 million viewers watched Sunday's episode, which featured the controversially delayed "Inside CECOT" segment, less than half of the audience it would've received on its originally scheduled date.
Joe Buck pushes back against Al Michaels criticism: ‘I don’t think it’s fair’
"It just drives me nuts because I'm such a fan of Al's."