2017 is a scary time to be a writer. Intensify that if you’re one of the many writers just laid off. Fox Sports cut writing full stop. ESPN still employs Wright Thompson and some high profile journalists. Though, the mantra from the last layoff round, firing writers, was “versatility,” the ability to do things that are not writing. Vocativ and MTV News are “pivoting to video.” Time Inc. Yahoo. Bleacher Report. Let us not forget Gannett cuts at its myriad of local newspapers.

Euphemisms and buzzwords will abound. But, the truth is straightforward: writing, whether in print or online, is not paying for itself. The audience may not be clamoring for cheap, crappy video “content,” at least consciously. But, advertisers are. Pop up ads annoy. Banner ads can be ad-blocked. That well-crafted written “content” below is window dressing to bombard you with the ad on the autoplay video. If you wish to support your favorite site, click on them.

Solutions to save writing? That’s the tough part.

The best way to make writing work is to subsidize it. Throughout history, great writing has had patrons. ESPN funded writing because it was flush with television revenue. Losing those oft-discussed cable subscribers is not good for the writing industry. The patrons of tomorrow in Silicon Valley are the very people “disrupting” quaint inefficiencies like the editorial department.

Writing can pay for itself (or try to). Sites have gone in two main directions. One is having a veritable army of underpaid or not at all paid writers producing a volume that pays for the prestige stuff from the fortunate few. The other is tailoring content for revenue production. 15 Reasons Writing is Dead! Come Read This Ridiculous Hot Take I Don’t Even Believe! Doing the latter too blatantly backfires when you watch your core audience erode.

A third way, perhaps the only way to make writing work long term, is a subscription model. The Athletic is a notable venture attempting this for sports.

Subscriptions require a collective rethink. Outlets opted in the early Internet days to not make readers pay. There’s an inherent expectation you can click on an article from a news outlet and not pay for it. You do pay, of course, but it’s with your attention to advertising. As the GOP Congress is finding out, walking back a perceived entitlement can be nettlesome.

That said, modest subscription-based models work on the Internet. It’s how people view television now (Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu, etc.). It’s how people listen to music (Spotify, Apple Music, etc.). It’s how people buy books. It’s how people buy clothing. It’s how (Grammarly) I am proofreading this article before submission. There are media apps like texture for reading magazines. Maybe there’s a market?

The challenge with the subscription model, of course, is finding subscribers. Building media brand recognition on the Internet is difficult. Even legacy print outfits like The Washington Post and The New York Times struggle maintaining it.

Niches are there to exploit. The Athletic is gunning for invested local sports fans looking for quality writing about their teams in the major cities. There’s a definite appeal to a garden walled off from advertising and click bait. But, if you’re breaking news or finding unique stories that draw attention, those things can immediately be aggregated. Put the important stuff outside the paywall? Readers have no reason to pay their way inside.

Writing still has value. It provides information efficiently. It captures nuance. It connects with the human experience in a way other mediums can’t. The audience, moreover, still wants to read. Despite the dizzying and diverse smorgasbord of free short-form pornographic video content on the Internet, Fifty Shades of Grey sales topped 100 million. The trouble is getting that audience to pay for writing consistently.

There’s no doubt writing will endure. Uncertain, as of this writing, is how many of us will be paid a living wage to create it. The future may see a lot of T.S. Elliots with a day job, serving as task rabbits, coding AI software, or caring for the elderly.

About Ty Duffy

Ty is a freelance writer/editor based outside Detroit. He's a Michigan Man. He enjoys dogs, whiskey, yoga, and composing pithy career summaries. Contact him at tyduffy@gmail.com.

  • Jeff Johnson

    Sadly, you make some great points in this well-written article. As a baby boomer myself, the video stuff is sometimes interesting, but I am by nature and by habit a reader. Personally, I have very little reason to go to foxsports.com any more. But you do make a good point in this day and age of the need for writing to sustain itself, and frankly, I can’t think of a better solution than yours in terms of doing by subscription. I don’t like it, but whether I like it or not, it very well may just be the way it is. It saddens me.

  • Pingback: A tragic plane crash, a pair of streakers and the mind of Kevin Durant highlight June's best sportwriting()

  • BobLee Says

    Can’t recall EVER agreeing with any of Ty Duffy’s articles. I DO agree with this. Pigs must be flying today. I recently quit as a contributor to a Fansided site over the issue of pop-ups and auto-videos littering my content. They, like may site owners, are only concerned with SEOs scores and could not care less about “content”. Mine or anyones. …. I have recently un-bookmarked both FS1 and ESPN due to video/ad litter.