With the New England Patriots hosting the NFL’s season opener against the Kansas City Chiefs on Thursday night, one of the many subplots were all the Roger Goodell clown towels showing up in Foxboro. That didn’t happen by accident as they were provided by Barstool Sports.

Love them or hate them, Barstool is becoming a major media conglomerate. And much like Deadspin before them, one that is willing to go places where pretty much every mainstream media company won’t go.

The question now becomes is that more what the future of sports media will look like? Or will the mainstream find a way to find their footing once again in the marketplace?

Barstool CEO Erika Nardini was the first guest on Daniel Roberts’ Yahoo Finance Sportsbook podcast and had some very interesting comments on the future of media coverage of sports in America. Namely, that traditional media and the leagues they cover have lost their separation of “church and state” and that Barstool can fill a gap with their “point-of-view” coverage. Perhaps most interesting might be the comparison for how Barstool covers sports to how UK publications and tabloids cover the Premier League in England.

“I don’t think being adversarial is something you calculate. I think you either have a position or point of view or you don’t. It’s not just football, it’s also baseball. I actually think the NBA is the most interesting league because they’ve chosen to be open. You see the difference in that in being open to your fans. The relationship between media entities and the leagues is so long-standing and tight that there’s really no church and state there and that’s not great for the consumer because you become very packaged and you become watered down. And you see this happen in most all sports I think. The place where you don’t see it, I actually look at Premier League and you look at some of the UK publications and the way they cover sports, I love that. That’s very Barstool.”

It’s true and it’s something that we continue to see the evolution of, going all the way back to the beginning of blogs. That’s how all this got started, isn’t it? Fans weren’t satisfied with the coverage they were getting from national television or the local papers and started getting it online. The EPL coverage is fascinating though because that’s a kind of journalism that is certainly very different than what you might be used to on an institutional level stateside, but you can see some of the same attitude in Barstool. There aren’t any walls or barriers to covering or writing anything. Sometimes that leads down some treacherous paths, but there’s definitely an appetite in general for more of a “take no prisoners” approach to sports coverage.

Nardini also commented on digital companies like Amazon and Facebook changing the game for sports coverage as well moving forward.

I look at that model as the future, that will come here I think. When you look at what will happen when the rights are up, it’s not necessarily going to be media companies, it’s going to be media platforms. Then it’s going to be a totally new game in terms of what is commentary and coverage and I think that’s very exciting… so when Amazon shows it, Amazon has a choice: are they going to create sports coverage the way sports coverage has always been done? Is Facebook going to do sports coverage the way sports coverage has always been done? And that answer is no they’re not. So it’s going to birth a new type of coverage of live sports.

It might not be very realistic to ever expect Barstool to step into a bidding war for rights to live games, but we’re already seeing them publish podcasts, radio shows, and gameday style programming so they’re not that far off. And if anything, more rights going digital and more coverage going digital opens the door for them to gain even more of a foothold than they already have. Barstool may never be the next ESPN, but they certainly have a strategy for how to operate in the new media climate.

[Yahoo Finance]

About Matt Yoder

Award winning sportswriter at The Comeback and Awful Announcing. The biggest cat in the whole wide world.

  • Jcool

    “It might not be very realistic to ever expect Barstool to step into a bidding war for rights to live games, but we’re already seeing them publish podcasts, radio shows, and gameday style programming so they’re not that far off.”

    Might be the dumbest thing i have ever heard. Not far off????? None of those things you mentions get them anywhere close to the revenue need to bid on live games. They will always be a niche operation.

    • BK

      I have my own YouTube channel. My friend has a podcast. I guess that means we’re ready to bid on the rights to air Yankee games in 2018.

  • BobLee Says

    IMO… there is no one answer to your question. Each generation of fans might have a preference for what they are “used to” or are especially turned-off by. I’m a baby boomer who grew up on SI every Friday and maybe The Sporting News… and familiar voices (Keith Jackson, Pat Summerall, et al) who were usually “shills” for the league / sport. I loved reading Jim Murray (LA Times) and Rick Reilly (in his prime, NOT the more recent version). ….. I’m fine with coverage of off-field issues BUT that quickly turns into highly partisan political rants from millennial know-it-alls and I click out of that ASAP. ….. using F-bombs and sex in headlines as blatant “click-bait” insults my intelligence but that seems to be the direction everyone is headed. …. I despise pop-ups and auto-play videos too, but those are also “the new direction”.

    I did not watch a single NBA game this past season and only watched NFL playoff games. I DO subscribe to MLB.tv for Cardinals games. No interest whatsoever in UFC. I realize I am no longer “a target market” for any media platform”. I’m OK with that.

  • Pingback: Julie Stewart-Binks joins Barstool, becomes site's first full-time female on-air hire()