Scott Van Pelt SportsCenter

Scott Van Pelt appears set to remain the face of ESPN’s midnight SportsCenter for some time to come. Marisa Guthrie of The Hollywood Reporter writes that ESPN has signed Van Pelt to a multi-year extension, and that his show’s drawing well when it comes to young viewers in particular:

ESPN has extended Scott Van Pelt with another multiyear deal.

Van Pelt, who hosts the midnight edition of SportsCenter and also is integral to the network’s golf coverage, is among ESPN’s best-known personalities. He’s also managed to remain controversy-free at a time when the social media minefield continues to ensnare many of his colleagues.

His show is routinely the top-rated program among young men in its time slot. For the year, Van Pelt’s SportsCenter is averaging 181,000 male viewers aged 18-34 followed by NBC’s Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon (99,000) and CBS’ Late Show With Stephen Colbert (80,000), which both begin a half-hour earlier, at 11:30 p.m. Van Pelt’s show also is up 20 percent year-over-year among total viewers.

“I was thankful ESPN had enough faith in us to give us the opportunity to try a different type of SportsCenter a couple of years ago. I’m equally grateful they felt we had earned this vote of confidence,” Van Pelt said in a statement. “We tried to outperform our last deal and we’ll try to do the same with this one.”

Added Norby Williamson, ESPN’s executive vp production: “We’re delighted that Scott Van Pelt will remain with ESPN for years to come. Scott and his team have created something very special with the midnight SportsCenter and fans have responded. His style and perspective make for a unique fan experience across ESPN platforms.”

This comes as ESPN is reportedly preparing to lay off over 100 workers after Thanksgiving, with the SportsCenter franchise expected to be hit hard. However, big names like Van Pelt were rumored to be safe from those cuts, and this extension further confirms that and is additional evidence that ESPN plans to stick with the midnight SportsCenter for some time to come despite the executive shifts this summer and fall (which saw Connor Schell promoted to overseeing all ESPN content, and Williamson shifting to run SportsCenter, with Rob King moving to head up news, 30 for 30 and more).

It makes sense for the midnight show to continue in its current format, though, as it’s shown improvements from the previous non-SVP midnight editions of SportsCenter in overall ratings, not just with that young demographic.

Our latest weekly ESPN ratings (for Oct. 16-22) have the midnight SportsCenter pulling in an average of 1,069,000 viewers, 593,000 in the demographic of adults 18-49. This gets its biggest bump from the Monday the 16th show (post-Monday Night Football), which drew 2,337,000 viewers (fourth amongst all ESPN shows that week), 1,221,000 in the 18-49 demo. Two other editions (Friday and Wednesday) cracked the million mark, though, pulling in 1,288,000 and 1,043,000 viewers respectively. We don’t know the specific numbers for the Tuesday, Thursday and Sunday editions, but they would need to draw 582,000 viewers for those other editions on average to hit that weekly ratings average. So, that would give it an average of 815,400 viewers if you exclude Mondays.

Back in December 2015, a few months after the launch of SportsCenter with Scott Van Pelt, we discussed John Ourand’s report of how it was averaging 659,000 viewers for Tuesday-Friday episodes from Sept. 7 through Nov. 19, but 3.398 million viewers for Monday episodes in that span. The previous midnight SportsCenter without Van Pelt averaged 712,000 for Tuesday through Friday episodes in a similar span in 2014, and 3.505 million for Monday episodes, so Van Pelt’s ratings were mostly flat from the previous but a little down.

The positive interpretation at that point was that ESPN ratings had dropped across the board and holding mostly flat was decent, especially given streaming and digital gains. Years later, those Monday numbers have kept dropping (a big part of that is that Monday Night Football ratings themselves have fallen heavily, prompting even some discussion that ESPN might not pony up for MNF rights in future), but SC with SVP seems to be actually outdrawing the old midnight SportsCenter on average on other nights. (And it’s not just for this one week; midnight SC with SVP averaged 1,089,000 for Oct. 9-15, and 1,409,000 for Sept. 25-Oct. 1, so a day-by-day breakdown for those weeks would likely also find a decline from 2014 in Mondays, but a rise in other days.)

The average viewership still changes dramatically from day to day, of course, and that reinforces the importance of a lead-in; any SportsCenter, Van Pelt or no, is going to do much better when it’s coming off a live college football or NBA game on ESPN. But it’s notable that Van Pelt is doing very well in viewership, both with younger viewers and with a year-over-year total viewership rise, and that his show appears to be outperforming the old ESPN midnight SportsCenter (after accounting for Monday Night Football‘s decline). That’s a point in favor of ESPN’s personality-driven SportsCenter strategy, and a point in favor of giving Van Pelt this extension.

[The Hollywood Reporter]

About Andrew Bucholtz

Andrew Bucholtz is a staff writer for Awful Announcing.

  • Shame Hannity

    I like SVP. I usually watch his Monday night show. “Bad Beats” with Stanford Steve is hilarious. My favorite part of his show and why I never bet any serious money on sports.

    • souvien

      Where in the world is (not) SVP is always good for a few chuckles!

  • Bscotch Bscotch

    Your math assumes all his telecasts are rated for the same length – which they are not.

  • StoJa

    SVP is literally the ONLY good thing at that stupid network.

    • dont_bring_me_down

      Until today. He just said those criticizing his network are so stupid they don’t deserve prayer.

      How thoughtlessly divisive.

  • Boardman Koko B Ware

    When it comes to tall, skinny bald white guys, he’s good but he’s no lead singer of Midnight Oil.

  • Shawn Rychling

    The only studio show on ESPN worth watching except for CF Final and CFP Rankings show. The debate clowns are not worth 30 seconnds of my time

  • noonan18

    I don’t watch it often but when I do I have found that he sticks to sports most of the time and stays away from politics. This could be a reason for his success. Not the total reason (because I think he is generally liked in the sports world) but a good reason why people aren’t turned off by the show.

    • Tookie Clothespin

      He covers all of the big sports topics that roll over into politics and all of the big political topics that roll over into sports just like everybody else does. He just doesn’t get crap for it like everybody else does.

  • Roger Bournival

    “Do these trendy square glasses make me look smart?”

  • Raymond Chuang

    I think Van Pelt’s show is helped by the fact it has become a major “go to” show after all the main sporting events of the day end.