Barry Blyn

There have been plenty of media arguments made that ESPN’s declining revenues have been about a perceived political shift, despite the holes in those, and the network’s now firing back with some data from a survey they commissioned. In a post on company blog ESPN Front Row Monday, ESPN vice president (original content and brand intelligence) Barry Blyn (seen above in a November 2014 interview) wrote that the findings of a May 3-7 study the company commissioned from New York’s Langer Research Associates (which also does research for The New York Times, CBS and ABC News, amongst other media outlets) “belie the notion of any impact on our business” from a perception of the company as too political.

Key points Blyn references there include 64 per cent of respondents saying ESPN was getting it right in terms of mixing sports news and political issues, eight per cent saying ESPN didn’t cover politics enough, the portion of viewers who see ESPN as politically biased being unchanged since October, 30 per cent of those who see a bias viewing ESPN as expressing a conservative viewpoint, and strong conservatives and Republicans ranking ESPN as 7.2 and 7.1 out of 10 respectively (versus liberals and Democrats’ rankings of 7.0). Upon request, ESPN provided Awful Announcing with some further data on the study and the data points Blyn referenced, although they did not provide a full copy of the study. Here’s their comment on how the study was done:

This survey for ESPN Fan and Media Intelligence was conducted by landline and cellular telephone interviews May 3-7, 2017, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 1,423 adults, including 867 ESPN viewers. The survey was produced and analyzed for ESPN by Langer Research Associates of New York, N.Y., with sampling, data collection and tabulation by SSRS of Media, Pa. Methodological details are available here. Results have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 points for ESPN viewers, including the survey’s design effect. 

Blyn’s piece also references changes from the last time this survey was done in October; it should be noted that this is not a constant panel of the same people, but another “separate, comparable, random national sample.” Here’s a look at the data points they discuss, with the extra data AA received:

  • 64 per cent of respondents said ESPN is getting it right in terms of mixing sports news and political issues. 18 per cent said there are too many political issues covered, 10 per cent had no opinion, eight per cent said there isn’t enough politics covered on ESPN.
  • Strong conservatives rank ESPN as a 7.2 out of 10 (up 0.5 from October), Republicans rank it as a 7.1 (also up 0.5). Liberals and Democrats rank it as a 7.0 (up 0.1 for liberals, down 0.2 for Democrats; those changes are considered not statistically significant.) 45 per cent of the sample scored ESPN between 8 and 10. The mean amongst all viewers was 6.9.
  • 30 per cent of viewers see political bias in ESPN programming versus 28 per cent in October, a change considered not statistically significant.

And here’s Blyn’s conclusion:

Do some Americans disagree with how certain societal issues are discussed on ESPN platforms when they intersect with the world of sports? No doubt.

Does it affect their viewing behavior? Not in any material way. Indeed, in 2016 and for the third straight year ESPN was the highest-rated full-time cable network among Men and Adults aged 18-34, 18-49 and 25-54.

So, what’s that all mean? Well, it’s one survey, an ESPN-commissioned one at that, and one where we don’t have access to the whole report, so it’s far from the be-all and end-all. However, it does provide some further ammunition against the largely-unsupported case that massive numbers of subscribers and viewers are leaving ESPN because of its perceived political slant. It is interesting that 30 per cent of viewers surveyed think there’s some bias, but that still means there are even more who don’t. And of those who do find some bias, they’re not all mad about it; only 18 per cent are specifically saying stick to sports more, and some think they should stick to sports even less. The similar overall ratings of ESPN from conservatives and liberals are interesting, too; they suggest that whether someone describes themselves as conservative or liberal isn’t too indicative of how they feel about ESPN.

Of course, this is a very big-picture look at the question of ESPN’s politics, and it’s possible that some who answered they don’t believe the network is biased overall or covers too many political issues overall still have problems with individual commentators or with individual decisions the company makes. It’s also worth noting that this data doesn’t appear to justify any further moves into the political realm from ESPN. But it does suggest that plenty of viewers are just fine with where the company’s landing on that sports/politics balancing act, and that while there are some unhappy with ESPN’s coverage decisions, that probably isn’t the cause of their revenue issues. (Cord-cutting and rising rights fees are much bigger problems, and neither’s particularly political.) It’s also notable that while this data isn’t perfect, it’s much more quantitative than anything the other side of this argument has offered to date. This certainly won’t silence the “ESPN is too liberal” people, but it’s further ammunition that the “ESPN’s financial issues are because they’re too liberal” theory isn’t the best one out there.

[ESPN Front Row]

About Andrew Bucholtz

Andrew Bucholtz is a staff writer for Awful Announcing.

  • Karl

    I mean twitter trolls say they hate ESPN’s “politics” but by “politics” they mean the black people who aren’t more like Stuart Scott. Oh, and some shit about Caitlyn Jenner getting an ESPY, like there’s a single person on earth who will ever care about winning an ESPY.

    • Deon Hamner

      Preach… You speaking the gospel. They even hated on Stuart Scott until he got sick and sadly passed. Now everyone loved him. You are also correct about Caitlyn Jenner and espy. Most people can’t even name 2 other winners of that award. People don’t like seeing the diversity of faces on ESPN. Look at the comments on how people hate the 6pm SportsCenter with Michael and Jemele. Stephen A Smith. Michael Wilbon and Tony Kornheiser does the same schtick as the rest of them. Nothing wrong speaking passionate about sports. If Espn was so left slanted, why is college gameday in the rural south most saturdays get the most viewers on the network?

  • Dale Moog

    Did anyone else notice the big flaw in this poll; I will wait for you to look. Oh wait they sampled 1,423 and only 867 of them watch ESPN. So I would love to see the answers from the people who said they do not watch ESPN to see how that changed the percents.You can claim a huge approval of your political coverage, but if all the people that claim to support your political coverage are non viewers than you are dishonest with yourself and others. Also when you conduct a survey looking for people that consume your product and only 60% of them say that they consume your product you have a major problem.

    • Elainebjackson

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj331d:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      !mj331d:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash331TopBoxPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj331d..,..

  • Yehuda Hamer

    BSPN

  • sportsfan365

    Just because you say it doesn’t make it true. ESPN has an agenda and it shows up in who they hire, who they cover, and what topics they feel obligated to address. If you like being preached to, then ESPN or the Trinity Broadcasting Network are undoubtedly your two favorite channels.

  • Roger Bournival

    If I’m paying for a study, you can bet your ass it’s going to come to the conclusion I paid for!

  • Pierlights804

    The panelists on “Around the Horn” are very liberal and they regularly give opinions that reflect their points of view. They come off haughty. The co-hosts of the 6 p.m. Sportscenter also get politically charged too frequently. The male host struggles to hide his temper whenever he pontificates and the female host is a marginal broadcaster, at best. I always try to catch PTI (I’m a loyal viewer), but I have to be punctual with the remote. I won’t watch even the last few minutes of its preceding show or the first few minutes of the one that comes after it. Sometimes I stick only to the podcast. ESPN either encourages its liberal personalities to speak up more or it’s indifferent whenever they do so. My viewing habits have been altered as a result.

  • Pingback: AA Weekly Recap: Hank Williams Jr. is returning to Monday Night Football()

  • Pingback: Caitlyn Jenner at the ESPYs: The night that many conservatives turned on ESPN()

  • Pingback: Jenner Award Rekindles ESPN's Hard Left Veer, Alienation of Conservatives - The Rightly Report()

  • Pingback: Jenner Award Rekindles ESPN's Hard Left Veer, Alienation of Conservatives | Fake News Registry()

  • Pingback: ESPN public editor Jim Brady doubles down on Twitter after backlash to Jemele Hill column()