Disney CEO Bob Iger.

Disney’s quarterly earnings reports over the last while have seen a pattern of declining revenues attributed to ESPN, and that continued again in their fiscal fourth quarter report Thursday. Reuters has more on how ESPN was part of a below-expectations performance:

Walt Disney Co reported lower-than expected quarterly revenue and profit on Thursday, dragged down by a poor performance at its cable business, including a drop in subscribers at ESPN.

…Revenue from Disney’s cable business, which includes ESPN and Disney Channel, fell marginally to $3.95 billion in the fourth quarter, while analysts on average were expecting a rise to $4.06 billion, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

ESPN, Disney’s cash-cow, has been trying to combat subscriber declines by joining smaller bundles of cable channels and developing a streaming service it will sell directly to consumers.

…Disney’s total revenue fell to $12.78 billion in the quarter ended Sept. 30 from $13.14 billion a year earlier.

The full Disney release on their earnings is here (PDF). It mentions that cable networks operating income “decreased $15 million to $1.2 billion for the quarter due to a decrease at Freeform,” and that at ESPN, “higher programming costs and lower advertising revenue were offset by higher affiliate revenue.” Some of that lower advertising revenue is thanks to less political advertising versus 2016. There were other non-sports losses, including the impact of Hurricane Irma on Disney World.

The release also mentioned a write-down of some BAMTech programming rights:

Equity in the income of investees decreased to $10 million from $150 million due to higher losses from BAMTech and Hulu and lower income at A+E Television Networks (A+E). The BAMTech results reflected a valuation adjustment to sports programming rights that were prepaid prior to our acquisition of BAMTech and increased costs for technology platform investments.

On Disney’s earnings call Thursday afternoon, CEO Bob Iger mentioned that ESPN subscriber losses weren’t as steep as in prior quarters, although he did add that they can’t take too much from a small sample size.

“We’re heartened by that as well, but it is one quarter,” Iger said.

Iger said some of that is driven by additional subscribers through over-the-top streaming TV services, and he’s been impressed with the aggressive advertising approach some of those services have taken, especially when it comes to sports events.

“We’re pleased with trends we’re seeing on the OTT side where we’re seeing a nice pickup in subs,” he said. “They obviously believe that the sports fan is potentially a primary customer of new OTT services.”

On the OTT front, Disney is set to launch their own direct-to-consumer ESPN product soon, with Iger saying that the new service will be called ESPN+ and will be launched in Spring 2018. That will be followed by a Disney-branded streaming service in the back half of 2018, which will contain both existing and new exclusive Disney, Marvel and Star Wars content. Iger said that those products are the highest corporate priority heading into 2018.

“Our goal here is to be a viable player in the direct-to-consumer space, space that we know is very valuable to be in,” Iger said. “”We believe creating a direct-to-consumer relationship is vital to the future of our media businesses and it’s our highest priority this year.”

As per that BAMTech writedown, it’s about one rights deal that was signed ahead of Disney’s purchase of the company; Disney felt that programming wasn’t worth what it was listed as. It wasn’t specified what rights deal that was

Something else Iger was happy with was the boost from examining Nielsen total viewer data for a couple of weeks, which considers streaming services, out-of-home and non-traditional viewing, mobile viewing and more. He said that provided ESPN with a major advantage compared to traditional ratings, boosting their ratings 25 per cent in total day, 29 per cent in prime time. Iger said that isn’t necessarily surprising, but it’s advantageous for ESPN to be able to show hard data on what they gain from out-of-home viewing, and that leads to an overall positive view on ESPN’s business.

“Frankly, we’re not really surprised by it though, because we’ve known for a long time that out-of-home viewing of sports is significant,” he said. “We feel good about what we’re seeing. While there’s obviously a lot of attention paid to ESPN and the loss of subs and all that, we’ve always been bullish on ESPN. …We like where ESPN is these days. …We think the trends we’re seeing are giving us reason to feel good about the business.”

[CNBC]

About Andrew Bucholtz

Andrew Bucholtz is a staff writer for Awful Announcing.

  • common_sense_is

    I’m a Disney shareholder. Every quarter you guys misrepresent what is actually reported. I read the earnings released and listened to the three hour call. ESPN revenue was “on par” with prior year. The main drivers of the revenue drop were Hurricane Irma and the fact that Cars 3 did less than half what Finding Dory did the year before plus less benefit from Star Wars and Frozen toy sales.

    • markvidpa

      But, but….Clay Travis said it’s all espn!!!!! He’s never wrong!

      • common_sense_is

        I like Clay Travis in general, but his reporting on ESPN is so incredibly biased and misleading. It would be like Hillary Clinton’s reporting on Trump or the GOP in general. You know you would not be able to trust a single word of it but it would likely be entertaining.

        • markvidpa

          He lies and is never entertaining

    • skirkpat12

      Your’re right because those two departments are picking up ESPN’s slack.

  • JWJ

    Does anyone know (cause I have not been able to find it) how much ESPN gets monthly from the OTT subscriber (via Sling or Directv or PSvue or Hulu)? Is it even close to the $7.50 to $8.00 per month ESPN gets from the cable companies?

  • Pingback: Proposed net neutrality repeal sports impacts could include hurting ESPN OTT, benefiting provider-owned broadcasters, slowing cord-cutting()